I’m a learn-it-yourself kind of guy, which means I learn by doing. As a result, it’s often hard for me to teach; instinctive learners like myself don’t always understand the progressions used by other types of learners.
By contrast, Michel Fortin’s always excelled at breaking things down for his readers, and his current post hits home: finding your own Unique Selling Proposition (or “hook”):
Time and time again, I’ve told many aspiring copywriters and marketers that a USP is what distinguishes you from the pack. It increases perceived value, expertise, and credibility — without needing to state it outright.
But since I hear this question often, particularly from copywriters just entering the field, I sense that it’s because people need a little help in defining their USP.
I’m guilty of forcibly confronting my readers with the concept of the value-added copywriter.
The idea is simple: in this age of cheap (or free) content, word jockeys will end up working for pizza money, and only those who bring more to the table than vowels and consonants will truly prosper.
Fortin’s post touches on that, but it’s really about defining yourself in a way that makes prospects want to call because you do something unique.
I’ve received a whole chunk of email lately from new copywriters looking for tips, and my first two are always “get a Web presence and then figure out why anyone should call you in the first place.”
After all, if you can’t explain to me why someone should hire you, how are you going to explain it to your prospects?
Give Michel’s post a read, and think about your “hook.”
Then read my own rant on the subject.
No one expects you to define your copywriting message any more than you were expected to know your career choice at kindergarten age, but damnit, I am expecting you to think about it.
And to keep writing, Tom Chandler.
Technorati Tags: michel fortin,writing,copywriting,usp,value added copywriter,writer,freelance writer,freelance copywriter
























Tom,
Now, this is just my opinion but…
I think being a value – added copywriter, which I am, IS your U.S.P. , or your “hook” as Michel puts it.
Not too many copywriters think that way, and end up being “word jockeys” as you put it.
Being a value added copywriter would therefor separate your copywriting practice from others, as a primary difference…
BAM! You have constructed a U.S.P.
Real marketing companies and high-paying clients look for a copywriter to bring more to the table than just clear, concise prose.
Thanks for making me think Tom.
Joseph Ratliff
Value Added Copywriter
Author of The Profitable Business Edge 2
Sometimes I wonder if personality has a lot to do with how a copywriter will define him/herself beyond “writer” … I’m an extrovert, comfortable with people and confident in my abilities and talents. Like Tom, I’ve always seen myself as leading with marketing expertise wrapped around the copywriting deliverable.
In fact, when I go from being the go-to marketing whiz to “the writer” that’s when I know I’m in trouble. Writers are more expendable than whizes.
For more introverted copywriters, I can really feel discomfort in having to deliver more than just the writing. I’ve met dozens of writers who just want to sit at their keyboards, write and not push additional services or engage any more than they have to with their clients.
Joseph: I wouldn’t want to confuse positioning with the concept of value-added. The concept of a value-added anything is hardly unique, but positioning myself as The Engagement Copywriter probably is. For me, “value-added” is in the messaging foundation, but it’s not the message.
Roberta: That’s an interesting point, and I fear the Internet has created a whole new race of copywriters who think they’ll never have to pitch a program (or concept), meet a client, or deal with the day-to-day bullshit that sometimes defines this occupation.
They’re wrong — at least if they want to become handsome, rich, famous and universally loved like we are.
This is a great post, Tom and you’re right on the money. I just got done reading Michael’s post and you both state the case for USPs in a way that’s tough to argue against them.
Contra USP: I’m just a word jockey and I do alright for myself. I don’t even bring my own vowels and consonants to the table and I make sick money. Corporate clients will pay outrageous sums for work that is, at its heart, little more than cutting and pasting approved “messaging.” For those clients, I haven’t positioned myself as anything but someone who can take punishment without complaining. Is that a USP?
Matt: Yes, that is. Sounds like you really enjoy that work.