<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Ubuntu Project: Is Linux Right For Word Workers?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://writerunderground.com/2008/06/22/the-ubuntu-project-is-linux-right-for-word-workers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://writerunderground.com/2008/06/22/the-ubuntu-project-is-linux-right-for-word-workers/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-ubuntu-project-is-linux-right-for-word-workers</link>
	<description>writing about writers and other letter-related debris</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 07:27:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Chandler</title>
		<link>http://writerunderground.com/2008/06/22/the-ubuntu-project-is-linux-right-for-word-workers/#comment-1376</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Chandler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 04:45:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://copywriterunderground.com/2008/06/22/the-ubuntu-project-is-linux-right-for-word-workers/#comment-1376</guid>
		<description>Have you ever tried the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.softmaker.com/english/of_en.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Softmaker office software&lt;/a&gt;? It&#039;s not open source, but it does run native on Linux, and they&#039;re claiming almost perfect MS Word file compatibility.

It looks a lot like Office 2003 (if it were run on Linux). I bought it but rarely use it since I just haven&#039;t hit the &quot;track changes&quot; wall very often.

30 day free trial, and the price is very reasonable (less than $100, though I downloaded the trial version and two weeks later got a lowball email offer in the $39 range).

As for modern word processors, I&#039;ve come to the conclusion they&#039;re more layout software than text editor - and that a lot of writers aren&#039;t particularly well served by their paper metaphor and bloated feature set.

And while I don&#039;t know if Wordstar was truly the last writer&#039;s word processor, I do know that WordPerfect&#039;s &quot;Reveal Codes&quot; brilliance has been stricken from modern word processors, and it&#039;s a damned shame.

I delve into my thinking around the modern online copywriter&#039;s text editor - and how we&#039;re simply &lt;a href=&quot;http://copywriterunderground.com/2010/05/13/the-15-features-online-writers-desperately-need-from-a-word-processor-which-still-doesnt-exist/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;not getting what we need from the tools available to us&lt;/a&gt;.

Give that &lt;a href=&quot;http://copywriterunderground.com/2010/05/13/the-15-features-online-writers-desperately-need-from-a-word-processor-which-still-doesnt-exist/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;post a read&lt;/a&gt;; I&#039;d love to hear your comments about my (perhaps surprising) conclusions.

One more thing; I believe there are Wordstar modes or keybindings available for some of the bigger editors (VIM or emacs). Obviously not a fit for MS Word compatibility, but for online stuff (where all the damned formatting codes are a pain anyway), one of those might be worth a look.

In any case, I agree with you; Linux just gets the heck out of the way, essentially saying just that in my &lt;a href=&quot;http://copywriterunderground.com/2010/07/05/why-your-next-pc-might-not-be-running-os-x-or-windows-or-more-ubuntu-linux-love-from-the-underground/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;latest post&lt;/a&gt;.

Thanks for commenting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you ever tried the <a href="http://www.softmaker.com/english/of_en.htm" rel="nofollow">Softmaker office software</a>? It&#8217;s not open source, but it does run native on Linux, and they&#8217;re claiming almost perfect MS Word file compatibility.</p>
<p>It looks a lot like Office 2003 (if it were run on Linux). I bought it but rarely use it since I just haven&#8217;t hit the &#8220;track changes&#8221; wall very often.</p>
<p>30 day free trial, and the price is very reasonable (less than $100, though I downloaded the trial version and two weeks later got a lowball email offer in the $39 range).</p>
<p>As for modern word processors, I&#8217;ve come to the conclusion they&#8217;re more layout software than text editor &#8211; and that a lot of writers aren&#8217;t particularly well served by their paper metaphor and bloated feature set.</p>
<p>And while I don&#8217;t know if Wordstar was truly the last writer&#8217;s word processor, I do know that WordPerfect&#8217;s &#8220;Reveal Codes&#8221; brilliance has been stricken from modern word processors, and it&#8217;s a damned shame.</p>
<p>I delve into my thinking around the modern online copywriter&#8217;s text editor &#8211; and how we&#8217;re simply <a href="http://copywriterunderground.com/2010/05/13/the-15-features-online-writers-desperately-need-from-a-word-processor-which-still-doesnt-exist/" rel="nofollow">not getting what we need from the tools available to us</a>.</p>
<p>Give that <a href="http://copywriterunderground.com/2010/05/13/the-15-features-online-writers-desperately-need-from-a-word-processor-which-still-doesnt-exist/" rel="nofollow">post a read</a>; I&#8217;d love to hear your comments about my (perhaps surprising) conclusions.</p>
<p>One more thing; I believe there are Wordstar modes or keybindings available for some of the bigger editors (VIM or emacs). Obviously not a fit for MS Word compatibility, but for online stuff (where all the damned formatting codes are a pain anyway), one of those might be worth a look.</p>
<p>In any case, I agree with you; Linux just gets the heck out of the way, essentially saying just that in my <a href="http://copywriterunderground.com/2010/07/05/why-your-next-pc-might-not-be-running-os-x-or-windows-or-more-ubuntu-linux-love-from-the-underground/" rel="nofollow">latest post</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks for commenting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: runbei</title>
		<link>http://writerunderground.com/2008/06/22/the-ubuntu-project-is-linux-right-for-word-workers/#comment-1375</link>
		<dc:creator>runbei</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 00:38:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://copywriterunderground.com/2008/06/22/the-ubuntu-project-is-linux-right-for-word-workers/#comment-1375</guid>
		<description>p.s. Fine point: I CAN do client work in OpenOffice, just not documents that require Track Changes or that have complex formatting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>p.s. Fine point: I CAN do client work in OpenOffice, just not documents that require Track Changes or that have complex formatting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: runbei</title>
		<link>http://writerunderground.com/2008/06/22/the-ubuntu-project-is-linux-right-for-word-workers/#comment-1374</link>
		<dc:creator>runbei</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 00:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://copywriterunderground.com/2008/06/22/the-ubuntu-project-is-linux-right-for-word-workers/#comment-1374</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a full-time writer, and I&#039;ve lived on Linux for about two and a half years. I use Linux Mint. I&#039;ve found OpenOffice to be useful for some types of projects, but by no means all. The Track Changes feature in OO is severely broken - with changes hidden - the only way to edit - the PC slows to an unbearable crawl after 6-7 pages. And much worse, OO tends to garble the hidden tracking verbiage with the displayed text, a fatal error when editing client documents on deadline.

I have not found an acceptable Linux alternative to MS Word for my client work. Thus, I&#039;m forced to use Word to edit all complex Word docs, and not only those that require tracking changes. (OpenOffice makes a complete mess of Word docs with complex formatting - and, yes, I&#039;m using the latest version of OO.)

That said, I do love Linux. It feels so light and fast. I&#039;m much more focused when I work in Linux - no need to respond to an ongoing series of nags from antivirus software, system updates that require logging in as admin and rebooting, etc., etc. I do use OO for everyday stuff, just not for anything where my living is at stake.

I&#039;ve used PCs since 1982. I&#039;m an old curmudgeon, and I KNOW that the last true word processor for end-users was WordStar. Every word-processing app since WordStar has taken us a step farther away from real word-crunching power. WordPerfect was fine, very powerful, but it just didn&#039;t let a writer crunch words as effectively as WS did.

Lately, I&#039;ve discovered that I can easily install, under Linux, both VDE (a WordStar clone) and WordPerfect 6.1 (downloadable for free on the Web, though I had the 3.5&quot; disks). It&#039;s quite easy - you can find directions for installing WordPerfect in Linux on the WordPerfect for DOS website (http://www.columbia.edu/~em36/wpdos/). Follow the directions, and you&#039;ll have a copy of DOSEMU on your system that you can use to also install and run VDE.

Haven&#039;t done much with them, and may never do so, as I&#039;m busy with work that I can do in OpenOffice and Word. But it&#039;s nice to have the option.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a full-time writer, and I&#8217;ve lived on Linux for about two and a half years. I use Linux Mint. I&#8217;ve found OpenOffice to be useful for some types of projects, but by no means all. The Track Changes feature in OO is severely broken &#8211; with changes hidden &#8211; the only way to edit &#8211; the PC slows to an unbearable crawl after 6-7 pages. And much worse, OO tends to garble the hidden tracking verbiage with the displayed text, a fatal error when editing client documents on deadline.</p>
<p>I have not found an acceptable Linux alternative to MS Word for my client work. Thus, I&#8217;m forced to use Word to edit all complex Word docs, and not only those that require tracking changes. (OpenOffice makes a complete mess of Word docs with complex formatting &#8211; and, yes, I&#8217;m using the latest version of OO.)</p>
<p>That said, I do love Linux. It feels so light and fast. I&#8217;m much more focused when I work in Linux &#8211; no need to respond to an ongoing series of nags from antivirus software, system updates that require logging in as admin and rebooting, etc., etc. I do use OO for everyday stuff, just not for anything where my living is at stake.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve used PCs since 1982. I&#8217;m an old curmudgeon, and I KNOW that the last true word processor for end-users was WordStar. Every word-processing app since WordStar has taken us a step farther away from real word-crunching power. WordPerfect was fine, very powerful, but it just didn&#8217;t let a writer crunch words as effectively as WS did.</p>
<p>Lately, I&#8217;ve discovered that I can easily install, under Linux, both VDE (a WordStar clone) and WordPerfect 6.1 (downloadable for free on the Web, though I had the 3.5&#8243; disks). It&#8217;s quite easy &#8211; you can find directions for installing WordPerfect in Linux on the WordPerfect for DOS website (<a href="http://www.columbia.edu/~em36/wpdos/" rel="nofollow">http://www.columbia.edu/~em36/wpdos/</a>). Follow the directions, and you&#8217;ll have a copy of DOSEMU on your system that you can use to also install and run VDE.</p>
<p>Haven&#8217;t done much with them, and may never do so, as I&#8217;m busy with work that I can do in OpenOffice and Word. But it&#8217;s nice to have the option.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Chandler</title>
		<link>http://writerunderground.com/2008/06/22/the-ubuntu-project-is-linux-right-for-word-workers/#comment-1373</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Chandler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 14:33:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://copywriterunderground.com/2008/06/22/the-ubuntu-project-is-linux-right-for-word-workers/#comment-1373</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t imagine going back to Windows - especially after working on my wife&#039;s XP, Vista, and Windows 7 laptops. Ick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t imagine going back to Windows &#8211; especially after working on my wife&#8217;s XP, Vista, and Windows 7 laptops. Ick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad</title>
		<link>http://writerunderground.com/2008/06/22/the-ubuntu-project-is-linux-right-for-word-workers/#comment-1372</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 00:12:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://copywriterunderground.com/2008/06/22/the-ubuntu-project-is-linux-right-for-word-workers/#comment-1372</guid>
		<description>Ubuntu is getting more and more end user friendly every day. I am a huge fan of linux over windows, any day! I just don&#039;t get paying high prices that is so insecure and having to wait for microsoft to fix a problem when I or the help of the community could solve it in a few minutes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ubuntu is getting more and more end user friendly every day. I am a huge fan of linux over windows, any day! I just don&#8217;t get paying high prices that is so insecure and having to wait for microsoft to fix a problem when I or the help of the community could solve it in a few minutes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C Vasile</title>
		<link>http://writerunderground.com/2008/06/22/the-ubuntu-project-is-linux-right-for-word-workers/#comment-1371</link>
		<dc:creator>C Vasile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 14:57:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://copywriterunderground.com/2008/06/22/the-ubuntu-project-is-linux-right-for-word-workers/#comment-1371</guid>
		<description>Thank you for a great blog article!

I will use this any time I need further proof to convince someone to give it a try.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for a great blog article!</p>
<p>I will use this any time I need further proof to convince someone to give it a try.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Chandler</title>
		<link>http://writerunderground.com/2008/06/22/the-ubuntu-project-is-linux-right-for-word-workers/#comment-1370</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Chandler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 05:16:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://copywriterunderground.com/2008/06/22/the-ubuntu-project-is-linux-right-for-word-workers/#comment-1370</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s relatively easy to do, but the kicker is that someone new to Linux wouldn&#039;t know to do it.

Still, I&#039;m running Ubuntu Linux exclusively these days - almost two years after the original post - so something&#039;s working.

Just upgraded to 10.04, which is working nicely. My Ubuntu experience is clearly worth another post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s relatively easy to do, but the kicker is that someone new to Linux wouldn&#8217;t know to do it.</p>
<p>Still, I&#8217;m running Ubuntu Linux exclusively these days &#8211; almost two years after the original post &#8211; so something&#8217;s working.</p>
<p>Just upgraded to 10.04, which is working nicely. My Ubuntu experience is clearly worth another post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CMD</title>
		<link>http://writerunderground.com/2008/06/22/the-ubuntu-project-is-linux-right-for-word-workers/#comment-1369</link>
		<dc:creator>CMD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Apr 2010 01:39:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://copywriterunderground.com/2008/06/22/the-ubuntu-project-is-linux-right-for-word-workers/#comment-1369</guid>
		<description>For playing encrypted dvds I usually install libdvdcss from the Medibuntu repository https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Medibuntu. Or you could also just install VLC from your package manager. it plays DVDs &#039;out-the-box&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For playing encrypted dvds I usually install libdvdcss from the Medibuntu repository <a href="https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Medibuntu" rel="nofollow">https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Medibuntu</a>. Or you could also just install VLC from your package manager. it plays DVDs &#8216;out-the-box&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Chandler</title>
		<link>http://writerunderground.com/2008/06/22/the-ubuntu-project-is-linux-right-for-word-workers/#comment-1368</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Chandler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 20:43:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://copywriterunderground.com/2008/06/22/the-ubuntu-project-is-linux-right-for-word-workers/#comment-1368</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s nearly two years after the original post, and I&#039;m still using Ubuntu Linux - which has grown up some in the interval (more than I can say for Windows).

At some point, I do want to experiment with a couple other distros, but at this point, getting stuff done is paramount, and I feel that&#039;s happening more quickly on Linux than it would in Windows.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s nearly two years after the original post, and I&#8217;m still using Ubuntu Linux &#8211; which has grown up some in the interval (more than I can say for Windows).</p>
<p>At some point, I do want to experiment with a couple other distros, but at this point, getting stuff done is paramount, and I feel that&#8217;s happening more quickly on Linux than it would in Windows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: riberto</title>
		<link>http://writerunderground.com/2008/06/22/the-ubuntu-project-is-linux-right-for-word-workers/#comment-1367</link>
		<dc:creator>riberto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 14:22:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://copywriterunderground.com/2008/06/22/the-ubuntu-project-is-linux-right-for-word-workers/#comment-1367</guid>
		<description>Welcome aboard!

I started using Linux after having &quot;Blue screen of death&quot; Issues with &quot;Windows 95&quot;.  ALSO in the early days of the InterNet text based Unix was a requirement.

So I new Windows was NOT my only option, so I quit drinking their &quot;Koolaid&quot;.

I started with RedHat 5 ??? Then Mandrake (now Mandriva) and for the last few years OpenSuSE.
Currently using OpenSuSE 11.2, KDE desktop.

Both my Intel 64 laptops have removable/swappable hard drives.  At work I&#039;m required to use XP, for EVERYTHING else (OpenOffice, Gimp, Kaffeine, VLC, Digikam, Skype, Evolution, Amarok, K3b, etc, etc, etc.) I love Linux

Yes, I also have a drive just for Kubuntu, another for Debian and who knows what OS I&#039;ll try out next.

Yes, live is full of and your computer you do have a choice.

Thanks,

Rr</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welcome aboard!</p>
<p>I started using Linux after having &#8220;Blue screen of death&#8221; Issues with &#8220;Windows 95&#8243;.  ALSO in the early days of the InterNet text based Unix was a requirement.</p>
<p>So I new Windows was NOT my only option, so I quit drinking their &#8220;Koolaid&#8221;.</p>
<p>I started with RedHat 5 ??? Then Mandrake (now Mandriva) and for the last few years OpenSuSE.<br />
Currently using OpenSuSE 11.2, KDE desktop.</p>
<p>Both my Intel 64 laptops have removable/swappable hard drives.  At work I&#8217;m required to use XP, for EVERYTHING else (OpenOffice, Gimp, Kaffeine, VLC, Digikam, Skype, Evolution, Amarok, K3b, etc, etc, etc.) I love Linux</p>
<p>Yes, I also have a drive just for Kubuntu, another for Debian and who knows what OS I&#8217;ll try out next.</p>
<p>Yes, live is full of and your computer you do have a choice.</p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
<p>Rr</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: basic

Served from: writerunderground.com @ 2012-05-23 04:55:48 -->
