<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Story of a Hollywood Marketer (or, What We Can Learn Reading The New Yorker)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://writerunderground.com/2009/02/02/the-story-of-a-hollywood-marketer-or-what-we-can-learn-reading-the-new-yorker/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://writerunderground.com/2009/02/02/the-story-of-a-hollywood-marketer-or-what-we-can-learn-reading-the-new-yorker/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-story-of-a-hollywood-marketer-or-what-we-can-learn-reading-the-new-yorker</link>
	<description>writing about writers and other letter-related debris</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:15:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: dragg</title>
		<link>http://writerunderground.com/2009/02/02/the-story-of-a-hollywood-marketer-or-what-we-can-learn-reading-the-new-yorker/comment-page-1/#comment-1748</link>
		<dc:creator>dragg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 11:12:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://copywriterunderground.com/?p=435#comment-1748</guid>
		<description>Some times ethics plays good role and some times not...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some times ethics plays good role and some times not&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Chandler</title>
		<link>http://writerunderground.com/2009/02/02/the-story-of-a-hollywood-marketer-or-what-we-can-learn-reading-the-new-yorker/comment-page-1/#comment-1747</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Chandler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 04:04:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://copywriterunderground.com/?p=435#comment-1747</guid>
		<description>My favorite are the huge, favorable review quotes that flash on the screen while the identity of the reviewer is hidden in tiny type. Why? Because no name reviewers would cough up a positive review, so they&#039;re milking a senior citizen weekly for a favorable review.

Still, the author&#039;s deftly written distinction between publicity and marketing made the whole piece worthwhile.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My favorite are the huge, favorable review quotes that flash on the screen while the identity of the reviewer is hidden in tiny type. Why? Because no name reviewers would cough up a positive review, so they&#8217;re milking a senior citizen weekly for a favorable review.</p>
<p>Still, the author&#8217;s deftly written distinction between publicity and marketing made the whole piece worthwhile.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graham Strong</title>
		<link>http://writerunderground.com/2009/02/02/the-story-of-a-hollywood-marketer-or-what-we-can-learn-reading-the-new-yorker/comment-page-1/#comment-1746</link>
		<dc:creator>Graham Strong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 14:22:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://copywriterunderground.com/?p=435#comment-1746</guid>
		<description>We don&#039;t go to see many movies at the theatres any more, and when we do I hate reading reviews because often they give too much away. I like going in cold, but I also want to be choosy about the movies I see.

Luckily, there has been a great trend lately. As a rule of thumb, the more commercials and advertising I see for a movie, the worse it&#039;s going to be. It&#039;s like they pile on extra advertising to push everyone in the first weekend. You know, like the article mentions, to convince them to &quot;see what all the fuss is about&quot;.

Along that same line, if you see certain critics giving the movie a good review, you just know it&#039;s going to be bad!

Conversely, when a movie opens in NY, LA, and Toronto first and then other cities later, you can bet it is going to be a better movie. They have the confidence that the &quot;early&quot; word is going to be positive, so they can build suspense around the movie.

Don&#039;t know if this approach makes me savvy or jaded, though.

~Graham</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We don&#8217;t go to see many movies at the theatres any more, and when we do I hate reading reviews because often they give too much away. I like going in cold, but I also want to be choosy about the movies I see.</p>
<p>Luckily, there has been a great trend lately. As a rule of thumb, the more commercials and advertising I see for a movie, the worse it&#8217;s going to be. It&#8217;s like they pile on extra advertising to push everyone in the first weekend. You know, like the article mentions, to convince them to &#8220;see what all the fuss is about&#8221;.</p>
<p>Along that same line, if you see certain critics giving the movie a good review, you just know it&#8217;s going to be bad!</p>
<p>Conversely, when a movie opens in NY, LA, and Toronto first and then other cities later, you can bet it is going to be a better movie. They have the confidence that the &#8220;early&#8221; word is going to be positive, so they can build suspense around the movie.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t know if this approach makes me savvy or jaded, though.</p>
<p>~Graham</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

