I’ve been writing advocacy copy by the bucketful, and while it’s recognizably copywriting, it demands a very different arc than product-oriented, “buy the soap” copy.
When you’re writing advocacy copy, you’re advancing a cause or nonprofit, and you’re often facing an opposition who isn’t competing for the sale, but actively trying to undermine your message.
To do that, some will create “facts” about as quickly as Carters manufactures little pills, and the one trap an advocacy copywriter can’t fall into is investing all your precious time and media space refuting your opposition’s fantasy.
That puts you on the defensive, and keeps you off your message.
Your Helpful Hint
Painters know that daubing a single spot of color on a painting suggests the existence of the same color across the entire canvas.
By the same token, refuting a single factual inaccuracy allows you to paint all your opponent’s arguments in a similar color.
Without slogging through them one by one.
On a recent project, the other side built a key argument atop a supposed unbiased, third-party quote… that they shortened to reverse its meaning.
After 15 minutes of research, I found it (for the record, I resisted the urge to send my opposite number a “Thank You” note).
Suddenly, I could dismiss a half-dozen of their arguments with one damming sentence.
Putting us back on track with our own message, not wasting time repeating theirs.
This isn’t foolproof stuff; those populating more extreme movements tend to ignore any and all evidence that stands apart from their own belief system, but then, they’re not your real audience.
Advocacy is about advancing your own persuasive message, not wasting all your time mucking about with your opposition’s.
Keep writing, Tom Chandler.
























Tom Chandler says he’s an advocacy copywriter. But what do we really know about him?
Fact: He writes a blog called “the writer underground”, previously known as “the copywriter underground”.
Fact: He advertises consulting and writing services on his website, and claims a “practical approach to modern marketing”.
Fact: He manages a Twitter feed chock full of writing tips, insights, and writing-related topics.
It’s time to ask the tough questions: is Tom Chandler really an advocacy copywriter?
[whispers]
Voice 1: Wait — that sounds like a copywriter… Are you sure we have it right?
Voice 2: Just read the script!
Voice 1: Ummmm…
——–
(BTW, great score — nothing beats good research, eh?)
~Graham
Graham Strong recently posted..OTF: Ode to Rewriting
Graham Strong(Quote) (Reply)
Tom:
Excellent! Yes! Absolutely correct that refuting one of an opponent’s falsifications can discredit their entire argument.
However, I’m not sure that aiming to prove that single falsification really obviates the need to research all or even most of their statements. Some of their statements will surely be more damaging than others and it would be better to find and use that one than one selected at random or for easier reseach.
My strategy – or is it a tactic? – has been to lead with one of the weaker falsifications and either allow that to be dismissed by an opponent as inconsequential during a discussion or by myself in writing. I then proceed to list the others in increasing order of damage until the final coup d’grace.
Enumerating them from strongest to weakest is boring, the case has been made. From weak to strong creates the impression that all of the falsifications are as bad as the last.
As in love and war, all’s fair in advocacy copywriting.
Best regards,
Michael Louis Weissman
Founder & Principal, CopyLogic
Michael Louis Weissman recently posted..George Bailey, Master Rhetorician: Case #2 – What’s Good for the Savings & Loan is Good for Bedford Falls
Michael Louis Weissman(Quote) (Reply)
Heheh… I’m always happy when Graham leaves a comment on the Underground; we first became friends just after he was released from prison (the first time), which I think was only a couple of months before he first tasted human flesh.
I agree. In this case I picked the one that seemed the most inexplicable, and even after I found the smoking gun (the altered quote), I checked the others, and while they were fabrications (or irrelevant), this was the clearest example they were Making Shit Up.
TC(Quote) (Reply)
TC,
Yes, and did I ever thank you for that evening? Lovely time. Just wish I knew the menu ahead of time — I would have brought a nice Chianti instead of that damned Merlot…
~Graham
Graham Strong recently posted..OTF: Ode to Rewriting
Graham Strong(Quote) (Reply)
My next blog post: What To Do With Troublesome Clients…
TC(Quote) (Reply)
Wow. No sooner do I get this post up than Mitt Romney’s campaign throws the Mother Of All Misleading Campaign Ads onto the playing field (Obama quoting a McCain campaign aide as Obama quoting himself).
Today’s caveat: Political “marketing” long ago crossed all the lines in the sand (in fact, it’s pretty much left the desert behind).
TC(Quote) (Reply)